Mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 211:2

והאמר אילפא שבועה קונה שבועה היא דקניא אבל כפירה לא קניא הכא נמי דקיימא באגם

which appears to prove that it is only the oath which would transfer responsibility, whereas mere denial would not transfer responsibility?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And not render the bailee a robber, contrary to the view expressed by R. Shesheth. ');">³</span> But here also we are dealing with a case where the deposited article was at that time situated on the meadow.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 615, n. 16. ');">⁴</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 211:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.